CMF Phone 2 Pro,Review, In 2025 is a qualified contender for the best smartphone of less than Rs 20,000. Whether or not this award will win, only time will tell. But, now, we take a look at how its cameras compare against more expensive Vivo T4,Review,The Vivo smartphone starts from Rs 21,999 in India and a dual rear camera setup with 50MP primary and 2MP secondary sensor. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also ships with 50MP main camera, but it is paired with 8MP ultravide and 50MP telescopic lenses – all of this is just Rs 18,999 for base variants.
To know how to rent cameras in various scenarios. To keep things fair, a shared camera mode was used between only two smartphones.
Decision
Despite its minor camera setup, Vivo T4 leads the CMF phone 2 Pro in both daylight and low-light situations. However, CMF phone 2 Pro shines in portrait photography and matches Vivo T4 in selfie and night mode.
| landscape | Winner |
| Day light | Vivo T4 |
| Picture | CMF Phone 2 Pro |
| Selfie | tie |
| Low -stop | Vivo T4 |
| Low-light (night mode) | tie |
Day light
The primary camera of Vivo T4 distributes results that attack a middle ground between the highly saturated tone captured by the CMF Phone 2 Pro and in a more subdu Its color bends towards science realism, with hue that usually avoids exaggerated vibrancy, is often seen in budget -friendly smartphone cameras. However, while the output feels more right-to-life, it does not cool significantly with the CMF Phone 2 Pro in terms of sharp and fine expansion breeding.
In complex disciplines such as texture, especially in the format or architecture, it may appear slightly soft on inspection. Despite this, Vivo T4 manages to maintain a commendable dynamic range, which effectively balances highlights and shadows in well -light scenes. This makes it a solid artist for casual photography, especially for users who prefer a more balanced, less processed look.
Winner: Vivo T4
Picture
The CMF Phone 2 Pro, Vivo T4 out in pictures, preserves those complex elements more frequent. The handset also provides a good separation of subjects in the foreground from the background and distributes skin tones that are close to reality.
On the other hand, Vivo smartphones face challenges in accurately separating the subject from the background in portrait mode. While its color reproduction bends towards a more vibrant and saturated palette, gives the pictures a vibrant look, it comes at the cost of realism.
Winner: CMF Phone 2 Pro
Selfie
Despite the characteristic of a small 16MP sensor, the CMF phone 2 Pro offers image quality on the summer with 32MP camera of Vivo T4.
The Vivo T4 maintains facial details more effectively than the CMF Phone 2 Pro, avoids highly smooth skin tones that often arise from aggressive processing. However, it bends towards overshatation, providing the colors darker and more vibrant, the more they appear. Additionally, the Vivo T4 has difficulty handling the risk of the background, which is often a pioneer for blow-out highlights or unequal lighting.
Winner: tie
Low -stop
In low-light, Vivo T4 cleaners manage to maintain more defined shots. Its color breeding is also more vibrant than the CMF Phone 2 Pro, which can sometimes be more silent in the same lighting. While the images of the Vivo T4 can display a slightly more grain, they maintain a level of expansion that the CMF struggles to match the 2 Pro, as the latter applies a flattening effect that softens the texture and reduces clarity. Photo of Vivo T4, although granular, preserves fine details and creates a better balance between noise and sharpness, making it a strong contender in low-light photography.
Winner: Vivo T4
Low-light (night mode)
Even though the Vivo T4 takes a long -term exposure shots by default, it has a dedicated night mode, which keeps the shutter open for a longer period for better results in the atmosphere.
The CMF phone captures night mode images with a touch of 2 Pro Vibrancy, lending them a slightly enhanced look. However, these images lack exact expansion and lack of overall sharpness. In comparison, the Vivo T4 handles low-light scenes with more and more cleverness, preserving the shadow details more effectively and more balanced illustration of the actual view, offering a trunk.
Winner: tie
final call
Vivo T4 and CMF Phone 2 Pro provide both impressive camera performance, each with its strength and trade-off. Vivo T4 carried forward with its primary camera in light landscapes, offering more balanced and realistic images. Its strong dynamic range and refined low-light processing gives it an edge to users who prefer natural looking results. Conversely, the CMF phone shines in 2 Pro Portrait photography, where it excels with better subject separation, more natural skin tone and sharp expansion. The handset also provides strong performance in night mode and matches Vivo T4 in selfie and low-light (night mode) shots.
As a result, the option between the two depends on your preferences. If You are looking for a smartphone with a more well round camera system, especially for casual or all-purpose photography, Vivo T4 is a better option. However, people who enjoyPortrait photography or a more budget -favorable option that can still give a strong performance, the CMF Phone 2 Pro keeps his land as a solid contender under Rs 20,000.
The Post CMF Phone 2 Pro vs Vivo T4 Camera Comparison: A performance to find a better photographer first appeared on TrakinTech News
https://www. TrakinTech Newshub/cmf-phone-2-pro-vs-vivo-t4-camera-comparison/
