IQO NEO 10R Vs Poco X7 Pro Perform Comparison: Best Performing Animals under Rs 30,000

.PERF_TEST {Margin-Top: 16px; } .Perf_test_wrap {Pading: 7px 0 1px; Status: relatives; } .Perf_test_wrap: First {material: ”; Background-Image: Reporting-Linier-Gadient (from right, #eded54 0%, #f6F6F6 1px, transparent 1px, transparent 9.6%); Status: absolute; Left: 12%; Top: 0; Height: 100%; Width: 100%; Z-Index: 1; } .Pref-rov {Performance: Flex; Aligned-Itam: Flex-Start; Justification-content: space-time; Background-image: Digeration-Real-Graadient (right, black 1px, / * line color and thickness * / transparent 1px 50px); Z-Index: 2; Status: relatives; Margin: 3px 0; } .Perf-Img {Flex: 0 0 10%; Margin: 1px 10px 0 0; Height: 38px; } .td-PB-Span12 .Perf-Img {Flex: 0 9.5%; } .Perf-Box {Flex: 1; Maximum-width: 100%; overflow hidden; } .Perf-num {Flex: 0 0 20%; Font-shaped: 16px; Lesson-composition: correct; Font-wisdom: normal; Line-height: 25px; } .td-PB-Span12 .Perf-num {flex: 0 23%; } .Perf-img img {maximum-width: 100%; Border-radius: 0; Maximum-height: 100%} .perf-meter {status: relatives; Font-shaped: 14px; Font-wisdom: 400; Height: 20px; Performance: Flex; Aligned-Itam: Center; } Span.pref_Meterbar {status: absolute! Important; Background: #cccc; Height: 22px; Width: 100%; Left: 0; Z -index: -1; Border-radius: 2px; } .Perf-meter span {margin: 9px 0 0; Status: relatives; Width: 100%; Put: 0 6px; White-space: nowrap; Text-Overflow: Elipsis; overflow hidden; Color:#000000; , } .thisphone .Pref_Meterbar {Background: #FF9352; } .thisphone .perf-meter {color: #FFF; } .Perf-Val {font-shape: 12px; Color: #7C7C7C; Margin: 2px 0 10px; Performance: Flex; Aligned-Itam: Center; Font-wisdom: normal; } .Perf_desc {text-monitor: Center; Font-shaped: 14px; Margin-Botum: 30px; Margin-Botum: 10px; } .greytxt {font-shape: 14px; Color: #777; Line-hit: 18px; Performance: Block; } 19p (Min-Varth: 1025PX): 0 9%; Margin: -2px 0 0 16px; Line-height: 25px; } .Perf-Val {font-size: 14px; Margin-Top: 7px; } .Perf_test_wrap: Before {Left: 70PX; } .td-PB-Span12 .Perf_Test_Wrap: Before {Left: 70PX; } span.pref_Meterbar {height: 28px; Margin: 3px 60px 0 0; } .Perf_desc {margin-top: 22px; } .Perf-meter {font-shape: 16px; } .greytxt {font-shape: 16px; Line-height: 22px; } .td-PB-Span12 .Perf-Img {Flex: 0 6.3%; Margin: -2PX 5PX 0 0; } .td-PB-Span12 .Perf-num {flex: 0 16%; Line-hit: 28px; ,

IQoo Neo 10R,Review) India has the latest performance-centered mid-range smartphone. It claims the flagship-grade Qualcomm Snapdragon 8S General 3 chipset, paired with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage, promising top-level performance. But how does it stack against Poco X7 Pro, which features powerful MediaTek Demisplication 8400 Ultra SOC in competitive sub-RS 30,000 segment?

To determine this, we run a synthetic benchmark and played graphic-intensive games on both smartphones to evaluate our performance capabilities under heavy pressure. See this detailed comparison to determine which of these two devices perform better.

Decision

Poco X7 Pro and IQO NEO 10R offer comparable performance in most categories, with a major difference – CPU throttleing. According to synthetic benchmark tests, Poco X7 Pro maintains better continuous performance during prolonged use.

Geekbench

It assesses the efficiency of the CPU’s single and several core (higher better).

Geekbench runs a single-core test to determine a multi-core test to analyze daily work performance and more intensive work efficiency on the device. Here are their related scores:

IQO NEO 10R scores better in single-core test but intervals in multi-core test. The smartphone is about 20 percent more in single-core test and 20 percent less in multi-core test.

Reference to the real world: IQO NEO 10R handles daily tasks like social media browsing, web browsing, texting, calling, and more. But if you want to game a smartphone and edit the media, then Poco X7 Pro will give you better service.

Winner: tie

Antutu

AnuTu assesses a smartphone’s CPU, GPU, memory and overall user experience (higher is better)

The performance of the smartphone is not determined by the processor alone. Many other factors such as memory standards, GPU and user interfaces play an important role in overall performance. We ran the Antutu benchmark on these devices, which test the memory, graphics, OS and processor to determine the overall performance of the device. See below IQO NEO 10R Vs Poco X7 Pro AnTuTu score below.

The IQO NEO 10R is slightly lower than the Poco X7 Pro on AnTuTu. He said, the smartphone is behind only 5 percent, which is not important for being a deal-breaker.

References of real world: IQO NEO 10R and Poco X7 Pro are commendable equipment that offer excellent overall performance. The pre -score is slightly lower, but it is not very clear in real -life performance.

Winner: tie

CPU throttle test

CPU throttle assesss continuous performance under heavy load (higher is better)

We know that both smartphones are comparable to normal performance. But when pushed to the border, how do they perform with intensive, prolonged use? We ran a burnput app on both smartphones, a strong test to throw the CPU and measure the performance.

As you can see, Poco X7 Pro, Dimstation 8400 operated by Ultra, better fare when pushed to the border. When the CPU was throttle, he retained 67 percent of its maximum performance, while compared to only 44 percent for Iku NEO 10R.

Reference to the real world:IQO NEO 10R provides powerful performance, but will warm and stutter when used intensely for long periods. The Poco X7 Pro also performs well, and thanks to better thermal management, it also maintains high peak performance under the Dures.

Winner: Poco X7 Pro

Gambling test

Average FPS during 30 minutes of gameplay (higher is better)

For gaming tests in 91mobiles, we play COD: Mobile, BGMI, and Real Racing 3 Games every 30 minutes play on testing devices. These games have been set on the same graphic settings on both phones during the gaming session. Except for Real Racing 3, which has a standard setting that dynamically adjusts graphical fidelity based on the device.

thermal performance

IQO NEO 10R intervens in average FPS in all sports, especially real racing 3. Poco X7 Pro is a better smartphone for gaming, but it also goes to heat more.

References of real world: Poco X7 Pro distributes better gaming performance but at the cost of increased thermal. On the other hand, IQO NEO 10R is more consistent to ensure better efficiency and thermal management during gaming.

Winner: tie

final call

Poco X7 Pro takes Crown Home when it comes to synthetic benchmark score, raw performance during gaming and even CPU throttle. The high maximum performance created during the CPU throttle indicates that the smartphone can perform very well with stress. If you are looking for a powerful gaming device, choose Poco X7 Pro, which starts from Rs 27,999.

The IQO NEO 10R also performs commendable, but it lags a bit backward in benchmarks and gaming tests. He said, it runs the cooler during gaming and thus provides a more well round performance. If he appeals to you, choose the IQOO device for a base variant for Rs 26,999.

The Post IQO NEO 10R Vs Poco X7 Pro Perform Comparison: The best performance animal under Rs 30,000 first appeared at TrakinTech News

https://www. TrakinTech Newshub/iqoo-neo-10r-vs-poco-x7-pro-performance-comparison/